Bring us a software change your current tools cannot explain.
Putnami is being shaped around consequential changes where teams and agents lose intent, impact, constraints, evidence, or operational context. A design partnership starts with one of those changes.
A focused, evidence-led conversation. No platform migration required.
A partnership brief should fit on one change.
| Signal | Current evidence | Decision |
|---|---|---|
| Client decision | Can this change ship safely? | must become clearer |
| System constraint | Impact reconstructed manually | observable today |
| Evidence | Repository + delivery trail | bounded access |
| Stop condition | No better decision after one change | do not expand |
A useful partnership begins with a real constraint, not a platform pitch.
- Consequential change
- The change matters enough that unclear impact, weak evidence, or failed recovery creates real cost.
- Visible constraint
- The team can point to waiting, reconstruction, escalation, correction, or risk in the current path.
- Available evidence
- Repository and delivery artifacts exist, even if they are fragmented or difficult to interpret together.
- Shared learning
- Both teams can test a bounded hypothesis and use what the change reveals to shape the product.
Is there one real change where better context and evidence would alter a decision?
That decision might concern impact, review, verification, delivery, audit, or recovery. The important part is that the constraint is real and the outcome can be observed.
Start with one bounded change, not a platform commitment.
Together we define the question, follow the existing path, expose the missing context, and decide whether Putnami can produce evidence worth extending.
- A representative change and the decision it currently makes difficult.
- The people, systems, and evidence required to understand it end to end.
- A bounded result that would create value for the team now.
- The mutual learning required before either side expands the partnership.
Bring one representative change. Leave with a clearer decision.
Leave your work email. Fabien will reply directly to understand the system, select a useful change, and decide whether a bounded engagement makes sense.
No newsletter sequence. No release waitlist. One direct conversation.